Tuesday, 1 July 2014

Roger (Helmer, UKIP MEP) and Me

Roger Helmer called me an idiot.

Well, I did misinterpret his tweet, quite deliberately, but only in the same way that he posted his tweet – giving the impression that Prince Charles endorsed UKIP’s education policy.

I also prefaced it with ‘The Mysterious Mind of Roger Helmer’, a continuation to series of tweets posted in the run-up to his failed by-election attempt in Newark.

All the quotes I posted are real. 
They came from either Helmer’s blog or from this marvellous document

which I noticed  has been updated since I last saw it. The juicy quotes are still there - like CO2 isn’t a pollutant as it ‘greens the planet’; global warming doesn’t exist, and other such terrifyingly stupid nonsense. He’s also added some new graphics.

It wasn’t made by ‘Josh aged 13’ – it was made by this guy (I’m sure UKIP obtained permission, as it seems they are all under copyright to the author, though he does give fair use permission with a credit on non-commercial blogs). 

The very nice cartoon is a little misleading however. This is what a fracking pad looks like.

 And this is what a fracking does to a forest. 

And the thing about fracking – you need THOUSANDS of them – at eight per square mile.

What has Roger updated in the new document? 

He removed the misleading temperature diagram and references to the discredited Channel 4 ‘documentary' The Great Global Warming Swindle and replaced it with the strange, unsubstantiated claim that “there are increasing doubts about the theory of man-made climate change”.

And this
             UKIP believes that the small changes we have seen in global temperatures in the last  
             century (+0.7oC) are entirely consistent with well-understood, long-term, natural climate

This is all kinds of stupid and I’m not going to give it any attention - if you like, you can start by having a look here and here.
His section blaming fuel poverty on green policies now has a new picture from Shutterstock. Here is another picture from the same set, of the same model.

He references a select committee report from 2013, but curiously not the actual report but an article in the Daily Mail!

He quotes this:

                    ...energy and climate change policies will add 33% to the average electricity price paid by UK households in 2020, in addition to any potential wholesale price rises.

Aha! Nasty green policies! Hang on – the very next sentence…

                 The Department maintains, however, that household bills will be lower than they would otherwise be in the absence of policies.

Oh so, hang on, the policies will actually make the bills cheaper…

Nevertheless – I’d agree (WITH THE COMMITTEE) that green subsidies would be better coming from direct taxation than levies.

He dropped the UKIP support for tidal power research. I wonder why?

Ah – he’s added more about Fracking – or what he now refers to as Shale Gas.

           The low levels of risk that may be associated with fracking are outweighed by the benefits  
           that cheaper and abundant energy can create, and by the risks that are associated by rising energy prices and a growing energy gap.

And nuclear  -

Anti-nuclear lobbyists love to argue that the waste will remain dangerous for tens of
              thousands of years. But our descendants in a few hundred years will have made vast
              technical strides that we cannot even imagine today. They may be mining our waste
              deposits, safely, to reuse in new ways.

Nuclear is OK because, you know, Science Fiction?

Coal is nice too.

We do not however regard CO2 as a pollutant. It is a natural trace gas in the atmosphere
          which is essential to plant growth and life on earth.
          Higher CO2 levels increase agricultural crop yields and “green” the planet.

I just love that bit!

The report also has a new contributor -  Ben Pile, Energy Consultant.

Meet Ben Pile, BA in Politics and Philosophy (PPE?), Climate Change Denier – and he doesn’t have much time for academics or environmentalists.

But he's actually been around for a while - he was part of Bloom's posse.

So as far as environmental policy goes, it looks like that we won't have to wait for the new manifesto - it's all here. Climate change denial, a fracking free-for-all, where we can suck down that lovely CO2 that makes our croquet lawns so green. Who needs science when we have the combination of the Mysterious Mind of Roger Helmer and a guy with a degree in PPE? We have stock photo models pretending to freeze, for goodness sake! And Nuclear is safe because...Space 1999!

Or maybe that's not such a good example...

Sunday, 22 June 2014

The protest you are not allowed to see

Yesterday I was one of the 50,000 people who marched through the centre of London, from the new BBC Broadcasting House, down Oxford Street, through Trafalgar and Piccadilly, to a rally in Parliament Square. We listened to short speeches from Owen Jones, Caroline Lucas, Mark Steele, Francesca Martinez, Len McCluskey, Diane Abbott, Jeremy Corbyn, Matt Wrack and Russell Brand.

But you probably don’t know anything about this, as the protest was not reported on the BBC, ITV or Sky. It was only on Channel 4 News and reported by Russia Today. The Guardian website reported it, but in common with every other major newspaper, The Observer did not run the story. 

The BBC obviously had forewarning that the protest was taking place. Note the extra heavies, and the fact that the plaza in front of the BBC was closed off. Yet no reporters, no camera crews, nothing.

The building on the left in this photo is the BBC. They would have heard the speeches, seen the banners and the people - all they had to do was stick a camera out of a window.

I took a camera because I wanted to blog about the protest, what was said by the speakers, spread the message. I didn’t know that once again, I’d be writing about BBC bias and control of the mainstream media by the government. 

The protest was one of the biggest I've been on, and was supported by a wide selection of trade unions, lobby and pressure groups and thousands of ordinary people who belong to none of the above, but just turned up to protest, with the idea of making their voices heard. 

Or so they thought.

The problem with our media-saturated society is that (in a twist to Baudrillard) if something isn't reported, it didn't happen. It isn't so much the media report supplanting the reality, it creates the reality. By running a media blackout, the effect of the protest is practically and easily negated. 

To an extent, the fact that the protest was not reported by the papers can be understood as they all have a particular ideological slant and political affiliation. But the BBC is a public service broadcaster, not supposed to have any bias whatsoever. Clearly in this case, the editorial decision was made in advance not to cover the protest at all. If not bias, what legitimate reason could there be for this?

The March
It was a very hot and sunny day yesterday, and the marchers were in good spirits; a good atmosphere right from the start. Whilst marchers continued to assemble, some of the speakers addressed the crowd - however I couldn't tell you who was there and what they said, as a police helicopter came in and hovered over the stage for some reason.

We set off and kept a good pace. I couldn't find the Green Party or UCU so ended up marching with comrades from the NUT. The hundreds of police lining the route had done a good job at stopping the traffic and closing all the roads, so there were no choke points. 

All of Parliament Square had been stopped to traffic, which was good given the number of people who eventually squeezed into it.

The speakers started off with Owen Jones, who gave a real old-fashioned tub-thumper of a speech. A line that stuck out in my mind, and I tweeted at the time, was that as a growing part of the population were disenfranchised by the major parties and were suffering under the austerity measures, they were losing hope. And this loss of hope had lead to the rise of UKIP. 

All the speakers underlined the themes of the protest, why all these groups had come together in common cause:

  • The current economic problems were not caused by the poor, but by the bankers, the super-rich, and yet it was the poor that were having to pay for it. We used to be able to afford all this stuff, libraries, education, the NHS and the welfare state, but now we can't because all the money has gone, and we are being told that it is the poor that have taken it.
  • Divide and rule - Tories divide the working class against itself by victimising the unemployed and disabled - blaming the immigrants who come here to work with stories about 'benefit tourists' - when it is the immigrants who supply a large proportion of the infrastructure.
  • Wages are coming down - not due to immigration, but the increase in zero-hours contracts and the creation of an 'army of the self-unemployed' - where most of the people in poverty and in receipt of benefits are actually working. The benefit system is being used to subsidise corporations who can then pay poverty-level wages - and also who coincidentally pay little or no tax in the UK.
  • The Tories are running a propaganda war against the welfare state and NHS in order to cut resistance to privatisation and eventual dissolution - despite a report this week that revealed that the NHS was the best public health service in the world. 
  • Welfare should not be based on the contributory principle. We all pay in for the good of society in general and consequently we all benefit from it, directly or indirectly.
  • Resistance is possible. The E15 mothers stopped themselves from being re-housed hundreds of miles away from their families; the  Doncaster Care UK strikers fighting NHS privatisation at ground level; the FBU - by the way, did you know they were on strike yesterday?

Miliband came in for particular criticism from Abbot, Corbyn and others over his 'youth tax' and pandering to the fabled 'middle-ground' of dissatisfied Tories instead of  arguing for principle and supporting his base. There were 50k of his base outside Parliament right there, and all of them were against this. Miliband may just have made himself unelectable and alienated many more people than he could have ever gained.

Green Party MP Caroline Lucas received a raucous welcome and seemed almost overwhelmed by the response from the crowd to what she had to say, one of those being support for a Robin Hood tax.

The best speech of the day in my opinion was given by comedian and writer Francesca Martinez.

Francesca was also interviewed by Channel 4 News - obviously what she has to say is irrelevant as far as the BBC is concerned. 

Later on, Russell Brand showed up. Personally, I'm not a fan. Nevertheless, if his celebrity value gets more people interested in the cause, then I'm not going to knock it. 

And the fight continues.

  • People's Assembly Stand-up Benefit gig on 7th July 
  • Public service strike on July 10th to include NUT, FBU, PCS, Unison, Unite and the GMB.
  • People's March for the NHS, Jarrow to London, starting 16th August
  • Mass Demonstration by the TUC in London, 18th October

The government and corporations may have almost total control over the mainstream media, but we can't let them win. We have social media, and we have ourselves. Everyone who was there yesterday can go back to their communities and spread the word, so even if we are censored they can't stop us from talking, from fund-raising, and ultimately from voting.

And as far as the BBC goes, the broadcaster we all own?

28 June - Owen Jones takes the BBC to task on indefensible bias and censorship: